<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sponsor’s Role in a Project is Imperfectly Clear – One Man’s Humorous Journey to Understand It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://forwardmomentum.net/blog/the-sponsor%e2%80%99s-role-in-a-project-is-imperfectly-clear-%e2%80%93-one-man%e2%80%99s-humorous-journey-to-understand-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://forwardmomentum.net/blog/the-sponsor%e2%80%99s-role-in-a-project-is-imperfectly-clear-%e2%80%93-one-man%e2%80%99s-humorous-journey-to-understand-it/</link>
	<description>Passionate. Focused. Driven.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:13:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christopher J. Ford</title>
		<link>http://forwardmomentum.net/blog/the-sponsor%e2%80%99s-role-in-a-project-is-imperfectly-clear-%e2%80%93-one-man%e2%80%99s-humorous-journey-to-understand-it/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher J. Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forwardmomentum.net/blog/?p=136#comment-260</guid>
		<description>There is also the idea that the PS should be high enough in authority to resolve conflicts across the organizational boundaries.  In the three (3) types that Dennis identified, i would almost say that all three would be on your steering committee, but that the PS of record should be the one with the highest organizational authority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also the idea that the PS should be high enough in authority to resolve conflicts across the organizational boundaries.  In the three (3) types that Dennis identified, i would almost say that all three would be on your steering committee, but that the PS of record should be the one with the highest organizational authority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Vlasich</title>
		<link>http://forwardmomentum.net/blog/the-sponsor%e2%80%99s-role-in-a-project-is-imperfectly-clear-%e2%80%93-one-man%e2%80%99s-humorous-journey-to-understand-it/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Vlasich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forwardmomentum.net/blog/?p=136#comment-254</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m finding three levels or categories of project sponsor: 
Philosophical - Usually upper level management that understands and commits to the concept and is willing to support the necessary cultural changes.
Fiscal - The one whose budget is funding the project willing to take the risk of losing the money if the project is killed.
Functional - This is the one (or group) that will realize the functional benefits of the project.

Depending on the scope of the project, if you don&#039;t  have sponsorship at all these levels, the project is doomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m finding three levels or categories of project sponsor:<br />
Philosophical &#8211; Usually upper level management that understands and commits to the concept and is willing to support the necessary cultural changes.<br />
Fiscal &#8211; The one whose budget is funding the project willing to take the risk of losing the money if the project is killed.<br />
Functional &#8211; This is the one (or group) that will realize the functional benefits of the project.</p>
<p>Depending on the scope of the project, if you don&#8217;t  have sponsorship at all these levels, the project is doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
