Forward Momentum: Delivering Results

By Rob Zell

I had a boss once who loved to draw on the white board. It became something of a joke on his team, that at the beginning of a meeting we would hide the dry erase markers before he came into the room. It never stopped him; he started carrying them around. Only recently do I truly appreciate his approach.

Sidebar for a personal story: My daughter’s soccer team recently ended their season and part of my end of season gift was a coloring book and crayons and the missive that it was something to help me reduce my stress (something of a gag gift). At home after the party, I sat down with the coloring book and colored a picture. I took the time to work slowly and carefully, experimenting with different colors and used shading to highlight areas. It took me back to a calmer time: I worked on the image for me, not for my boss, or my kids, or for the executive committee – just for me. I loved it.

I am known among my peers as the visual learning guy. I push hard on the team to use fewer words and more pictures in both the training materials we produce and the presentations we create. If an image is worth a thousand words then we should we be creating voluminous training in images, not pages of text. Too often, the push back is, “I can’t draw” or “I’m not creative.” Let me say now that everyone can take this approach given some processes and tools.

1. Take some time to tap into your creative side. A quick search on Google yields a plethora of sites on coloring to relieve stress. I’m not saying you should make it a daily habit, but why not take a few minutes once in a while to doodle? It unlocks a thinking habit that thrives on free association and random connections that you might not have considered. Those links are the foundations of innovation and might lead to bigger and better ideas.
2. Incorporate a process for thinking differently. The Six Thinking Hats framework developed by Edward de Bono is a wonderful starting point for organizing meetings and encouraging a style of thinking. Assign the role of Green Hat to various team members and have them work at being the creative, “blue sky” thinker. By assigning the role to a person you give permission for ideas to flow and remove limitations.
3. Encourage mind-mapping as a technique for organizing information. On many occasions I find myself in meetings struggling to grasp how all the parts of a program or initiative are tied together. The various stakeholders have input into the problem and the resulting maelstrom can be hard to decode. A mind map can help illustrate the interconnectedness of all the ideas and make concrete the linkages that the entire team needs to see.
4. Seek out visual representations of complex ideas. I have two sites I visit regularly to keep my mindset firmly planted in a visual approach. One is the RSA.org channel on YouTube. This British think tank does a fabulous job of linking thought leaders to artistic displays of the concepts. The images drawn in the videos make the presentations so much more vivid. Another is visual.ly a web site that shows how information can be presented visually and, in my opinion, more memorable.

Finally, let me say that visuals don’t have to be high end art work to be effective. A very simple visual can speak volumes to the reader and communicate at more levels than a paragraph of text. Visuals are great for learning, meeting management, brainstorming, even project management (what’s a WBS but a visual of all the tasks in a project?). Don’t fear the creative side, embrace it and take your projects and work into a different, better, more holistic place.

How are you using visuals and creativity to work more efficiently in your role? If you aren’t using them now, how could you?

By Vicki Wrona, PMP; Dr. Gerald Mulenburg, PMP

While talking with the team, we thought it would be fun to share some of the recent books that we have been reading and hear from you what you find interesting and relevant now. There is never a shortage of professional (and fun) books, so together, hopefully we’ll all find something new to read and enjoy!

Recent books from Vicki:

Books that I have recently completed and have enjoyed are as follows. Note: I listen to more books than I read, and not only are these good books, they are also well-narrated.

• On Second Thought: Outsmarting Your Mind’s Hardwired Habits by Wray Herbert – Interesting list of the shortcuts and biases that our brains use and how to become aware of them so we can enjoy the positive aspects and avoid the negative consequences of each. These biases include why 99.9% of the citizens of France but only 28% of Americans are organ donors, why people who are hungry for lunch donate less money to charity and why early birds serving jury duty are more likely to give in to racial stereotypes when the day gets late.

 

• If You Ask Me (And of Course You Won’t) by Betty White – this is a fun, light-hearted read. I listened to this in audiobook form and it was wonderful hearing Betty White read the book. Listening to her talk was like sitting down with a good friend and learning from her 7-decade career.

 

• The Steve Jobs’ Way: iLeadership For a New Generation by Jay Elliot, William L. Simon – read Vicki’s review of this book here. Listening to Jay Elliot, Sr. VP at Apple and one of Steve’s early employees, read this book and tell the story makes you feel like you were there.

Recent books and suggestions from Jerry:

Books that I have recently completed and have enjoyed are as follows. (This book’s theme parallels the book Vicki mentions, On Second Thought, which I can’t wait to read.)

• Thinking on Purpose for Project Managers: Outsmarting Evolution by Bill Richardson – If you’ve ever wondered why so many poor decisions are made on projects, this book identifies why, and what can be done about making better ones. In clear, no-nonsense writing, the author provides the background for why we make decisions the way we do, what is sometimes (often it turns out) wrong with the way we make them, and how to make better decisions through what he defines as thinking-on-purpose. A major problem in projects, Richardson says we’re often thinking on autopilot, which he defines as reacting to events as they occur using quick-and-dirty or good-enough solutions. He takes the reader through a series of simple steps to help recognize ineffective patterns of thinking, biases, emotions, and blind spots that cause these problems, and he describes how to improve awareness of them—how to think about what you think about.

 

• It’s Your Ship: Management Techniques From the Best Damn Ship in the Navy by Naval Captain Michael Abrashoff – read Jerry’s review of this book here.

What books have you recently read?

By Kathy Martucci, PMP

Editor’s note: This is the second post in a series about implementing PeopleSoft projects. The first post on whether PeopleSoft is right for your organization can be found here.

Your organization just purchased over $1 million worth of PeopleSoft software licenses and, even if it’s never implemented, contractually owes Oracle for hundreds of thousands of dollars in maintenance fees annually. 

NOW WHAT?

As we discussed in the previous blog, any single suite of PeopleSoft (two examples are Supplier Chain Management or Human Capital Management) is a monstrous challenge to implement. And implementing more than one is the definition of an extremely complex project. Talk about replacing all your current systems with PeopleSoft is just crazy talk. 

There are important decisions to ponder and determine before cracking the shrink wrap on the software and diving in: 

1. Hardware infrastructure and software architecture

• How many servers of what size(s) does the organization require to offer the type of performance necessary?
• How many end-users will there be, how many batch processes, how many and what type of transactions? 
• What about redundancy? Need 100% uptime? Automatic failover?  Disaster recovery plans?

Fortunately, Oracle has an entire department dedicated to assisting organizations in sizing their hardware systems for optimum performance. Take advantage of them. Do not underestimate the need for an extremely large and robust infrastructure. 

2. Project model

What type of resources and how many are required for the project? It’s a safe bet that, even if your organization has several competent Oracle database administrators and an overabundance of programmers (yeah, right), the organization doesn’t already employ experienced PeopleSoft implementers. That means a competitive bid for outside systems integrators if you’re in the public sector and some heavy duty due diligence about who to hire even if you’re not. Some of the categories of resources necessary are: 

• Systems engineers
• PeopleSoft functional implementers
• PeopleSoft programmers
• PeopleSoft security experts
• PeopleSoft integrators
• Business analysts
• Organizational subject matter experts for each functional area to be implemented
• Testing experts
• Project managers
• Training and communication staff

And that is just the beginning.

3. Project Methodology

All the PeopleSoft implementers use basically the same project life cycle methodology – they just give it their own special brand name in order to differentiate them from their competitors.  The organization should thoroughly understand the project life cycle and the inputs, strategies and outputs of each and every step along the way. Then and only then will the organization and not the contractor be in charge of the project and its processes. If the project management maturity of the organization is relatively low, the very best strategy is to hire a seasoned project manager early in the process.

Conclusion

These are only three out of dozens of potential challenges and questions to be considered. 

What will be your organization’s first steps now?

By Vicki Wrona, PMP

I recently read two articles by Roger Connors regarding how to increase accountability on our teams. (1-Accountability Leads To Greater Influence and 2-Uncontrollables?) While he is working with large organizations on complex projects, the principles offered apply to small teams as well. One of the complaints I hear from senior management is lack of proactive action by their employees or project teams. What I hear them talking about is accountability. In classes, I will often ask if participants have noticed that there are those managers or project managers who are able to get the better resources, more budget when needed, better management support and who tend to deliver more successfully? What do they do differently?

They act accountable for delivering results rather than sitting back and letting things happen to them. They are more proactive in a way that Connors offers as a simple thing to do. When working with a team, they often ask, “What else can I do?” This question posed to the team brings out new ideas, gets the team used to hearing the question and possibly thinking in these terms themselves. It is what allows teams to deliver more quickly by fixing inefficiencies or finding more creative solutions. It is what allows teams to deliver on budget when it seems that is not possible. It is what allows teams to discover new uses for either existing products or new products being created. It is what allows teams to educate the end user so the new process or the new product being developed is accepted, used or followed.

The other point made in these articles is that there is more in our control than most people initially believe. I often bring this point up when discussing risk with teams, and discussing steps that can be taken to prevent a threat or enhance an opportunity. We may not have final say in many matters (FDA approval, economic conditions, management priorities, etc.) but we can influence them to some extent, and often to a greater extent than we initially believe. Many people do not want to believe this, but again I will ask if you have seen someone who is able to influence more things than the average worker. Often, these people are not those high up in the org chart, but instead those who are proactive and willing to take accountability. To support this idea, Connors provides an example of a team who increased the speed of government approval tremendously, a process that many believe is out of their control.

What do you think? Do you believe we can influence accountability for ourselves and our teams? How have you done it?